The College Board has
their spin doctors on call and ready to tell us a story. But the fairy tale makes them out to be the
white knights coming to the aid of over-stressed, financially strapped
students. What a crock!
Beginning in 2016, the
SAT will have only an optional writing prompt that will be graded separately
from the main test. This reverses changes made in 2005 when colleges, spearheaded by the University of California
system, threatened to stop making the exam mandatory for incoming freshmen and in
some cases, abolishing altogether any requirements to take the exam. In a panic, the College Board revamped the
SAT, adding a writing portion (and an additional 800 points) to go with the
traditional verbal and math portions for a grand total of 2400 points
possible. With the latest changes, the
exam will revert to the old 1600 perfect score.
Where the bull really
starts flying is in the statements by the College Board publicity machine. This new and improved SAT will align the exam
with what students learn in high school and eliminate any advantage gained from
hiring test prep tutors?! First of all,
students are not learning all that much in high school, so this is the
equivalent of “dummying down” the test.
That is nothing new; even the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE)
is an impossible hurdle for many students, and that test is tied directly to what students supposedly learn in public high
schools up and down the state. But the
second part of that statement is a doozy: we are to believe that the College
Board is so intent on erasing the economic advantage students who can afford
tutoring have over their poorer brethren that they are rewriting the test to
help those less fortunate? Yet, they are
also announcing a new partnership with one of the biggest test prep tutoring
firms around: Khan Academy. Yes, the College Board owns the SAT and will
now also profit as part of one of the largest test prep companies. They’ll collect on both ends—student exam
fees and test preparation tuition. What
a sweet deal!
In addition to
dropping the writing portion, they will modify the vocabulary questions to drop
more obscure words for more commonly used vocabulary. This is Orwellian doublespeak meaning they
will dummy down the vocabulary section.
They will do the same for the math portion, moving away from the theoretical
questions and emphasizing more real life problems. I can imagine an example: if a well-known testing company sees an
opportunity to boost their revenue by partnering with a test preparation
company, how much profit will they make every year? In addition, if they make the test easier
both to take and to score, will that increase profits even more? It does not take a genius to see that they
will own the test and cash in on the test preparation industry, an industry
they have maligned for years saying such tutoring does not help students do
better on the test, even though independent research indicated the opposite.
Of course, the SAT
must remain competitive against the growing influence of another college
entrance test, the ACT. Many colleges
now accept ACT scores along with, or even in place of, SAT scores. The ACT has an optional writing section, and
its scoring system will now be closely copied by the College Board for the new
and improved SAT.
One more way the
College Board is “looking out” for students:
the revised SAT will now be tied closely to the new Common Core Standards espoused as the savior for our failing schools and their unfortunate
graduates. Less imaginative literature
in favor of more informational texts like business memos, reports, and
workplace writing. Common Core is like
the “new math” curriculum in the 1960s and 70s, or whole language in the 1980s
and 90s. Like those abandoned
“revolutions” in education, will Common Core still be around in five
years? Undoubtedly, the SAT will,
because the folks at College Board are experts at reading trends and milking
the most financial gain out of hapless students caught in the switches.
Here is what should
happen: abolish all admissions testing
for college. Already, admissions
committees are looking at grade point averages, teacher recommendations,
extra-curricular activities, and even the course selections of incoming
students. At best, the SAT was simply one
piece of evidence in a holistic admissions profile. It is not, nor has it ever been, a good
indicator of how students will do in college.
That is best indicated by how well they did in high school, how
challenging the curriculum, how they adapted and flourished within the system.
The only thing the new
SAT will do is make its owner, the College Board richer. Anyone with critical thinking skills and an
analytical mind can see that. I wonder
if the new SAT will do any better at determining if students have those skills? Probably not, because that is not the goal of
the College Board. For them, it’s all
about profit.
It occurs to me that one might wonder just what benefit the various colleges and universities in this country derive from a continued affiliation with either SAT or ACT? Is there money back-flowing to the administrations? There's certainly enough empirical data to use to evaluate a student's application, so why the extra testing?
ReplyDeleteA smart man once told, always follow the money...
Nice post, Mr. Martin.