Recently, in an effort
to save a few bucks, I decided to close out my storage unit at one of the those
chain places. I had a hazy recollection
of what was inside my unit having last been there a year ago. I sorted through boxes of books, reboxed
those I wished to take home with me and prepared the rest to be donated to a
local charity. I also had several boxes
of manuscripts and notebooks which I put into their own stack to take back to
my now very crowded apartment. Inside, I
rediscovered almost fifty volumes of journal writing, with many more notebooks
un-numbered but dated.
I thought this would
be a treasure trove. Finally, with all
my journals in one place, I could study them to see my thinking patterns over
the years and to mine them for possible essays in the future. This could be the key to a decent memoir.
I was deeply
disappointed.
Let’s just say that I
realized how much I repeat myself. How
interesting can it be to see entry after entry bemoaning the lack of time to
write, the discouragement, the disappointment, the rejection. Sure, there were glimpses of life in my
description of what was happening then, snippets of events and special days,
but the majority was just the daily drudgery of being a reader, a writer, and a
teacher. The notebooks were full of my
own manic mood swings, mostly to the darker side.
There are good
journal-writers around. Anais Nin, Susan Sontag, and the recently published compendium of David Sedaris' work gathered
over the years from 1977 to 2002, to name just a few. I have always been a sucker for writers’ and
artists’ diaries; they offer, in the best case scenario, the inside scoop on
how a book or article came to be, or what it was like to live through a
significant time. Don’t we all live in
significant times? More often, though, I
encounter what I saw on the pages of my own notebooks: the complaining and whining of a poor writer
or artist. It is too late now to end
this hobby; I love reading writers’ journals and always will.
So it was with great
interest that I opened a recent publication of Oxford University consisting of
three early notebooks from a teenage Jane Austen that contained some stories
and outlines demonstrating her extraordinary ability only beginning to
surface. Austen was a voracious reader
of all kinds of writing from the staid to the pulpy, a greedy omnivore of
anything she could get her hands and eyes on.
In fact, she decorated and arranged her notebooks in the publishing
style of the day, the editors of Jane Austen: Teenage Writings (Oxford
University Press, 2017) tell us. Kathryn
Sutherland and Freya Johnstone have done an excellent job compiling the book
from those initial three notebooks stored in the Bodleian Library at Oxford
(Volume the First) and the British Library in London (Volumes 2 and 3). This girl had her eye set on a goal and her
talent is obvious from the beginning.
When she began the
notebooks in her eleventh and twelfth year, around 1786, Jane was already a
precocious reader, and of course reading in those days was primary
entertainment on a cold winter’s night.
People gathered for what the editors call “sociable reading,” which was
more of a performance of the work than a traditional reading aloud. Clearly, Jane was after positive affirmation
for her writing, and the notebooks show her development as a novelist as she
experimented with story, character, scene, and tension. What is also clear here is her sense of
humor, namely a sharp wit and gift for observation, which is evident in several
selections. The stories are really
outlines; some chapters are barely given a sentence of development. She was simply trying out techniques she had
learned from her own reading of novels, and that is what makes this volume so
interesting to Austen fans and scholars.
Austen practiced her
craft throughout her life, often for the private amusement of her family. Her nephews and nieces inherited these
notebooks and using their aunt’s words as a jumping off point, actually
continued some of the notebook stories in their own hand. This made the editors’ job critical to
determining what was written by Austen and what was added later by another
family member. In many cases, the plots
and characters function as a primitive fan fiction that we see on the internet
today.
Austen’s work here is
also rendered much as it was found, with spelling and grammar errors. This was the time of Samuel Johnson, and
dictionaries and regular spellings were largely absent from publishing. People were left to spell phonetically and
creatively before standardization kicked in as we see today. This adds the hint of a child’s work to the
book, but the adult Jane is there, too.
For Jane Austen fans,
this book is necessary and worth acquiring.
If one has read some of her work before, or has yet to experience this
gifted writer, the novels are really Austen at her finest. Notebooks are for trying out
things—characters, lifestyles, themes, symbols.
Journals are for practice, and therefore, some should never see the
light of publication. Although authors
throughout history have had their papers burned when they are gone, we are in
the age of the digital archive now, and writers often donate large caches of
their papers to libraries for the benefit of researchers. However, could something in those archives
actually damage a writer’s reputation?
In every case, the interest in what is going on in a writer’s mind or
within her labyrinthine ruminations often reveal a mode of thinking, a way of
seeing the world. Therein lies the value
of writers’ notebooks.
In studying her
teenage writings, we see the roots of the major English novelist we have come
to love in Jane Austen. However, for
most fans, having the novels is enough, leaving the fragments and early musings
to scholars to study and parse.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I would love to know who is commenting. Therefore, please use the selections below to identify yourself. Anonymous is so impersonal. If you do not have a blog or Google account, use the Name/URL selection. Thanks.