From the time of Dead Man Walking (Vintage, 1994), Sister
Helen Prejean has been a force to be reckoned with on her mission to stop the
death penalty and its extraordinary application to people of color, and, even more,
to people who ultimately are exonerated.
Her advocacy is simple and direct:
be present as witness to the execution of a living person by the
state. She also reaches out to families
and loved ones of the victims.
Her latest book, River of Fire: My Spiritual Journey (Random House, 2019),
is a memoir of her early years as a novice nun and details what led to her
becoming one of the fiercest opponents of the death penalty in this country, an
advocate, as she explains in the book, who has changed the position of the
Catholic Church, an organization that is notoriously difficult to sway.
The book begins with
an epigraph attributed to Saint Bonaventure:
“Ask not for understanding, ask for the fire.” Prejean has done that consistently in her
life, risking her support from her community, the Sisters of Saint Joseph
(CSJ), and often putting herself at odds with the Church and American law and
order culture. In the book, she
describes the transition of her early life from a novice to a teacher in a
white suburban parish in Louisiana to working in one of the most fearsome
projects in the city of New Orleans, the St. Thomas Project, an
African-American low income housing facility.
She does not simply minister to the people she meets who are often
living in extremis, she lives with
them in poverty and crime.
For most non-Catholics,
it is difficult to imagine the sea change that the Second Vatican Council of
1962-1965 initiated. Sister Helen
sketches out the revolution. Pope John
XXIII called the council in an effort to address the changing world of the
1960s with the assassinations, free love, the Vietnam War and the revision of
cultural norms that had been in place since the end of the Second World
War. Moving forward, the Church would
conduct liturgies in the vernacular instead of Latin, that most dead of
languages; nuns would be encouraged to drop their distinguishing habits for the
garb of the every woman; the priest would now face the congregation during
Mass; and, most disturbing to many diehard Catholic clergy, a focus on
spiritual outreach and the opening up, or reframing, of the idea of Christian
vocation. Prejean explains that “Top
notch holiness was no longer only for nuns and priests…everyone in the Church
is called to follow the way of Christ fully and radically. Everyone is called to be a saint. Everyone is called to pray deeply. Everyone is called to act boldly against
injustice.” This will have a profound
effect on Prejean and her mission as a human being.
Early on in the book,
though, there are some troubling issues.
As Prejean enters the novitiate, a young woman on the cusp of adulthood,
she becomes a “spouse of Christ,” which she says is the most lofty “state of
life for a Christian, higher than marriage and the single life.” In her picture of the daily functioning of
the novices and their superiors, she describes surrendering any sense of self
at a time when most young people are coming into self-actualization: embracing self-esteem, a healthy self-image, developing
self-awareness. She voluntarily
withdraws from “the world and its temptations” to “contemplate and achieve
union with God.” She will take vows of
chastity, poverty and obedience, but the tension here is clear: how to deal with being reduced to child-like
status at the start of adulthood.
Prejean must ask
permission to drive a community car, she must clarify where she is going when
she leaves the convent, she must clear her friendships, and, most alarming, she
writes: “When you become a nun, you can
never again step into your family home—not for a meal or a family reunion or a
marriage or anything except for the death of one of your parents, and even
then, if they live in a city away from the convent, you may have to decide
whether you’ll visit before they die so you can say farewell or wait and attend
the funeral. As a nun you are strictly
forbidden to sleep away from the convent.”
Some of this is
attributable to what Prejean takes from her order’s founding in Le
Puy-en-Velay, France that “to attain union with God demanded nothing less than ‘annihilation
of self.’” How can someone make her way
in the world, fight against injustices, stand up and bear witness against
oppression and discrimination, if she has no sense of self? It seems paradoxical, but one would need a
sense of self first before becoming selfless.
Nuns do not have money to purchase books and must ask the order for the
funds and permission. Nuns need the okay
of the community to do the things many of us take for granted as adults in the
world. Becoming a nun, in Prejean’s
account, means renouncing one’s independence and adulthood to take vows that
effectively render them children.
This is never more
clearly contradictory than in the chapters where Prejean describes two
significant friendships in her life. One
is a fellow sister with whom she develops a life-long bond. It is, in her words, a special
friendship. Although there is nothing
overtly sexual in Prejean’s accounting, it is more like a partnership. The two women often find themselves living
apart, but they vacation together and see each other when Prejean goes to
Louisiana for community meetings and activities. The other relationship is with a priest,
Father William, a fiercely intelligent yet deeply flawed man who really enters
into a romantic liaison with Prejean that spans decades. The fact that they cannot consummate the
relationship in sexual love, much less marriage, makes him a tragic figure in
the story. Their union also seems to
stretch the borders of chastity—they call it the “third way,” which is where a
priest and a nun commit to love each other with a “preferential love” but stay
in their vocations and remain celibate. There
is no sex, but the terms are really a matter of semantics in regards to
commitment and fidelity. Is not the vow
of celibacy so the priest or nun can devote him or herself fully to God and the
people?
The other issue here
involves what Sister Helen takes as her life’s work: opposing the death penalty. She writes early on in the book that “For
sixteen centuries the Catholic Church has unerringly taught…that the state has
the right—indeed, the duty—to keep society safe by imposing the death penalty
on violent criminals.” Later on she
writes that in her younger years, this support sounded “morally right” to
her. Obviously, this is building toward
her awakening and realization of her life’s work, but how can a person who
believes in the Imago Dei, the image
of God in every person, support the execution of that person? The Catholic Church vigorously opposes
abortion of a fetus, a person or, as science tells us, a group of cells that
cannot survive outside the womb. Yet, it
advocates killing a living, breathing human being because he or she is a danger
to society when that same person could be locked up for the remainder of his or
her life. To me, it is a failure of
critical thought: the Church should
advocate that all life is sacred. This means
coming out against abortion, but also opposing capital punishment, protecting
nature, and recognizing climate change.
All life is sacred, or it isn’t.
Thankfully, though,
Sister Helen Prejean had her great awakening, and her advocacy for death row inmates
has led to changes in the law in some states, and changes to the policies of
the Catholic Church. There is still more
work to be done, and there will need to be others who step up and take the
courageous position Prejean has taken. She,
however, is not resting with that one issue.
She ends the book with a letter to Pope Francis advocating for the
respect and dignity of women. She
writes: “I am saddened to encounter over
and over a very deep wound at the heart of the Church, a wound which, I am
convinced, infects and weakens every aspect of Church life. That wound…is the way the Church treats
women.”
River of Fire lacks the intensity of her other books, but it does
show us how the woman became the advocate.
There are some troubling issues here, but Sister Helen Prejean is a good
storyteller with a good story. It is
history, culture and religion, but most of all, it is human.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I would love to know who is commenting. Therefore, please use the selections below to identify yourself. Anonymous is so impersonal. If you do not have a blog or Google account, use the Name/URL selection. Thanks.